Actors may still strike
The prospects have become increasingly poor for an easy resolution of the contract negotiations between the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) and the producers group (AMPTP), which have reached their 35th day, and with current developments now look to last until at least mid-July. If the dispute is not resolved by late summer, the timely resumption of filming for Lost's Season 5 will be jeopardized.
Part of the problem is that SAG's sister union AFTRA has reached a tentative deal with the producers, a deal which now goes to vote with its general membership. The results won't be announced until July 8, more than a week after the June 30 expiration of the actors' contract. That also means SAG probably won't cut a deal before that announcement. More than 44000 actors hold cards in both unions, and SAG is lobbying heavily to have "their" actors vote no on the AFTRA deal: if the deal does not get a green light among its members, AFTRA may be forced to reluctantly rejoin SAG for joint bargaining for a better deal from the producers. It also means SAG is unlikely to go on strike before July 8. In fact, SAG has not yet made the significant leap of actually putting a strike authorization to vote among its members.
The producers are not staying still either. They have taken the extraordinary step to announce they will soon make the actors a "final offer", and offer which is likely to be made before June 30, and also likely to be ignored by SAG, at least until July 8 when they can evaluate their leverage after AFTRA's vote. However since the offer almost certainly will make no compromises on the various points SAG really wants, it looks like there will be a larger battle mid summer.
The next thing to watch for in the news is if SAG begins a strike authorization vote among its general membership, and whether or not it passes.
Read more at Variety.
(If you're just learning about this news, you can catch up with our summary here.)
July 2, 2008 Update: The contract has expired at the end of June 30 as expected. The actors have not struck, and the producers have not locked out the actors. Also as expected, the producers gave their "final offer" as promised, less than a day before the contract expired, an offer that reportedly made no movement on the main platforms of the actors. The rhetoric between SAG and AFTRA has been heating up regarding AFTRA's contract vote among its general membership, with big names such as Tom Hanks, Jack Nicholson, George Clooney recently offering their various opinions. About half of AFTRA members also are in SAG, and SAG has been campaigning for these dual card holders to vote down the contract. The entire industry is still awaiting these results, which should be known early next week on July 8. The vote may be used by SAG to help guess if its own members have the will to pass a strike authorization. If the AFTRA contract vote passes, SAG will find itself without enough support among actors for its views, and may be forced to compromise with the producers. If the AFTRA vote fails however, SAG will have more leverage with the producers with a now-realistic option to strike in its bargaining arsenal. Stay tuned for July 8.
July 9, 2008 update: It was announced yesterday that AFTRA members ratified the contract. SAG is perceived to have less leverage now, although they are spinning the story to point out that the ratification percentage was unusually low (62.4% rather than >90%), and the vote included members of AFTRA who are not actors. No one knows how the news will play out, but now the ball is in SAG's court to comment on the AMPTP's "final offer", which we may hear in two days on Thursday, when talks resume. Read more at Variety here, and also read their commentary here explaining how the timing of the Writer's strike affected SAG, back when the industry was wondering if the writers would wait until now to strike simultaneously with the actors.



11 comments:
Bastards. Not enough millions per movie for them? They should be shot, if it weren't for the fact that there would be no LOST if they were.
Oh well, they are loyal to $$$ over LOST if they still on strike whole fall season
Wow, niwram, that was about the most ignorant thing you could say about a strike. Contracts with the AMPTP aren't for specific wages per film, although often an industry "minimum wage" is set. The contracts are for the basic rights of all members of a profession to be treated equally and fairly by their employers. Whether you make millions per movie or only a couple hundred, you have a right not to be taken advantage of. The AMPTP is an infamously proud organization that has often chosen to lose billions of dollars in strike-related off-production, rather than giving anyone an inch when it comes to what they demand and deserve. Writers do have it a lot tougher, but if the contracts are unfair within the industry, then it needs to be resolved with compromise. "Within the industry" is an important distinction, because since you likely work in same income range as most of us and work the same types of jobs, you have no insight into what is or isn't fair within a multi-billion dollar industry. Rights of paid workers is a concept that does and must transcend class boundaries
Just remember...they're not striking for Jack and Kate. They're striking for Scott and Steve.
This will also affect the Transformers sequel, which just started shooting three weeks ago.
Although they have allegedly built in a strike delay hiatus option in their schedule.
It's all a bunch of commie nonsense. Union's are the biggest waste of time on the planet. Worthless!!!!!
I'm sooo sick of the strike B.S.!!! It's far past time to put an end to all this commie nonsense. Union are corrupt and counter-productive, and comepletely Un-American.
- Better Dead, Than Red!!!
Less than 1% of actors make millions of dollars per film.
Most make about $35,000 per year...IF they can find steady acting work.
Niwram, you should do research before you speak next time - as an actor I'm offended by your attitude.
What I'm worried about is the economy. I'm sure LA will be just fine, but places like New Mexico, where 60% of new jobs over the last five years have been in the film industry, are going to get slammed, again!
I understand that both SAG and AMPTP have their pride and their wallets to consider, but the truth is this bitch-fest stands to cost allot of people their livelihoods. I.e. crew on these movies/shows (e.g. me. I make $750 a week in the props department of a movie currently in production in Southern and Central NM, can't say which. sorry. I was unemployed all the way through the writer's strike, and if SAG strikes I probably will be again.)
Unions Un-American?
So by that regard, workers shouldn't be able to fight and protect their rights... To me thats fascist and Un-American!
Marshall, Freedom of Assembly is in the Bill of Rights, and so as commie as it may be, it's not un-American. "Un-American" is a term that was made up by anti-communist politicians in the mid-2oth century in order to get the public on their side. America, unfortunately, isn't an idea, but rather a stretch of land in North America with official and unofficial colonies elsewhere in the world. So to say something is un-American is to say that it is not currently happening in the continental or extra-continental United States. Since unions are very popular in America, as referenced by our topic, it is impossible for them to be un-American. You may interpret them as unconstitutional if you'd like, and at least then we'd be able to debate fairly, since it'll be your ill-informed opinion and not your incorrectly stated fact. If you really do some research on unions, you'll find that the goal is to protect workers (most Americans) from abuse at the hands of employers (a smaller number of Americans). In fact, America was formed because of assembly against abuse. And yes, most actors don't make a lot of money. Professional actors, like doctors and lawyers, have a high percentage of unemployment. Some of them make a shit-ton of money, but most of them struggle their entire lives with minimal payoff and a lot of student loans
Post a Comment